kbrichoux
Hopelessly confused

Registered: May 2003
Location: Somewhere in the middle
Posts: 497 |
No, Holly, this stuff doesn't make me crazy. I love it! I only get uncomfortable when someone says to me: "What writing books did you use?" Which is uncomfy because the answer is: none. Which usually makes me look like an uptight, snobby little b****, .
I read Crusie's CFY years ago. I think it was one of her better mainstream books. Yes, Quinn was in a similar situation with...Bill? wasn't it?...as Nicci with Rob.
But this topic brings up an interesting question: Why do we always think that a character--particularly a heroine--must be strong in all areas of her life? I've had the criticism that Nicci seems to be too strong a person to fall for Rob. Yet I know tens if not hundreds of women who--when other things are crashing down around them--get involved with a guy they don't really love for reasons that seem completely alien to their personalities. I was one of them. I had a long relationship with this one guy I didn't even particularly like. We had nothing in common and yet I stuck to him like glue. Why? Because everything else in my life was coming unglued. And here was this person who "took charge" of things and didn't require me to think.
Not thinking is not me. And I dealt with the rest of my life in my usual calm, logical way. But I stayed in this "safety" relationship for almost a year. I'm still not sure why, even though I've analyzed it to pieces. I think it has something to do with the fact that I was not required to invest anything emotionally in the relationship. But why I chose the "relationship" option over the "no relationship" option is something I haven't quite figured out. It may be something as simple as the fact that human beings are--by nature--pack (as in, wolf pack) animals. They feel insecure if they're alone.
But how do you--as the author--explain this contradiction to people who are looking for consistency in your characters? People are made up of contradictions. That doesn't necessarily mean they should do something "out of character," but I don't think it's necessary for the heroine to be some kind of goddess who never does anything out of weakness. Everyone is weak in some area. For me, what makes a good story is when a character overcomes his or her weaknesses and makes decisions which are strong.
I think--and this is my opinion only--that characters can't be constructed. Characters come from honesty and experience. I have a number of short stories from my college days in an old file. In those stories my characters were just being "deep." Those stories really suck, . Because characters should be real and honest--not just vehicles for a plot or a "look at me!" for the author. If a character is facing a big, life-altering decision or event, honest reactions based on the character's history, beliefs, and vision of the world will determine the plot.
You are right to point out that the danger to Nicci came more from Rob's definite decisions and take-charge attitude. However, the beige-house life was what caught *Nicci* up short. Because for her, the decision had become one of moving down a traditional path followed by her sister and Ginger (and most likely ending as disastorously as Ginger's marriage) or going down the path which was the right path for Nicci. Yes, the danger came from Rob's ability to override Nicci's fragile and growing comprehension of what the choices for her were, but for Nicci, that danger was not part of the decision process.
Dang, I don't think that made much sense .
A good book to read is _Story_ by Robert McKee...not to follow his suggestions really, but because he explores the interaction of character and plot. You might enjoy it!
And I think I went in a different direction than you were going! Hmm...
Best,
Karen
__________________
Karen Brichoux
http://www.karenbrichoux.com
Available now:
The Girl She Left Behind (NAL Trade 7/05)--An RT Bookclub Top Pick!
Coming in November 2006 from NAL Accent:
Falling Into the World
Report this post to a moderator | IP: Logged
|